November 09, 2010

I find it so fascinating that American culture remains obsessed with the story of down low bisexual men “giving” straight women HIV. Between Oprah’s two down low men specials and Tyler Perry’s For Colored Girls’ scene starring Janet Jackson, I almost climbed out a window and dangled myself in the face of death…after all when unmarried women sleep with ANY man unprotected, that’s essentially what they’re doing.

Before some of y’all get your panties up in a bunch, let me provide a disclaimer. On this blog, the only woman who gets a free pass from a lecture on unprotected sex is the married one. She can legally hold her husband accountable for his infidelity, unmarried women cannot. It is what it is, not what it should be. And I’m not here to debate the politics of marriage and commitment. More women are contracting HIV everyday, and we have filmmakers and major media personalities that are stuck on promoting unrealistic stereotypes.

As black women remain the highest demographic of new hiv diagnoses, it is so dangerous for media to constantly shift the responsibility off women to bisexual men. First off, where is the data that states bisexual men are the overwhelming cause of women getting HIV? Secondly, if 72% of black babies are being born out of wedlock, a ton of unmarried black women are having unprotected sex and, thus, risking their health for pleasure.

Tyler Perry’s scene is NOT the norm. Married black women remain such a small demographic of our community that even common sense should tell you this story is a minute fraction of reality. This is not to say that there haven’t been cases, but it’s rare.

As Pearl Cleage wrote in What Looks Like Crazy on an Ordinary Day, “I got HIV from fucking men.” For most women, that’s the reality. Sexual orientation is irrelevant. The truth is that unprotected sex feels good and better than protected sex, so let’s stop beating around the bush. And if women want to take the risk of engaging in that type of contact with their male partners, there is no one to blame but themselves. Wrap It Up or Shut Up. That’s my new campaign and I may actually launch it.

There’s something else that deeply disappointed me with Perry’s FCG scene. He had the opportunity to mainstream a nuanced discussion on male bisexuality in heterosexual relationships, and instead he fell into the stereotypical trap. I always ask women who complain about undercover bisexual men, are you prepared to listen and have discussions on male bisexuality within your heterosexual relationships? If he was upfront with you, how would you process or stereotype him? ::cue my documentary, The Bi-deology Project:: The overwhelming response is “HELL NO” or if the woman is more polite, “I’d be uncomfortable.” Of course, I ask why and the woman typically replies with a media stereotype ::cue Tyler Perry, Oprah, DL Hughley, Sherri Sheppard:: saying that bisexual men are more likely to transmit HIV and can’t be monogamous with women.

Wow…so now we’re in the business of telling people whether or not they practice safe sex, are STD free, and incapable of being monogamous…without even asking them or getting them tested? I wonder if people assume that every black woman they meet has HIV? After all, we are the number one growing demographic of new HIV cases…at least there’s been research that proves that.

I’m just saying, the longer we continue to base HIV contraction on stereotypes, the more we continue to shoot down the FACT that HIV doesn’t have a name or face. The longer we run from recognizing that not everyone that wants a heterosexual relationship has a purely heterosexual past, the longer honest conversations on sexuality will be oppressed and hidden. The longer we think that we can see these things coming, the more we will continue to sacrifice ourselves.

Someone please tell Mr. Perry to leave the conversations about sexuality to someone that has better intentions than melodrama. Yes, you can keep your script and your down low HIV man too.

I hope that this post, and other’s like it, will reach enough women and combat some of the small realities that he and countless others have managed to mainstream. We can and will do better.

November 05, 2010

Some people never find THE ONE. They find THE TWO, THREE, FOUR, or FIVE. They find that love can exist simultaneously for multiple partners. And, they love more than one partner openly. What if this, polyamory, was the norm for contemporary intimate relationships?

Monogamy is not for everyone. Since the beginning of time, humans have loved multiple partners simultaneously, some in secrecy and others in the open.  As polyamorous relationships are based in openness, perhaps, it’s the answer to most “monogamous” couple’s infidelity issues. I hate cheating for its secrecy and deceit. However, if all partners, regardless of gender, have the freedom to love more than one person openly, I call that fair game.

Here’s where things start to get interesting…

Theoretically, polygamy allows for a man to openly have more than one wife and a woman can have more than one husband…or perhaps even a woman can have more than one wife or a man can have more than one husband. You get my drift (I have yet to hear of homosexual polygamy but please feel free to drop knowledge if I’m out of the loop). Theoretically, I would call polygamy fair, except in most circumstances only the men get the polygamous “privileges.” I find that heterosexual polygamy often contains an abundance of gender prejudice, limiting a woman’s sexual empowerment and equal opportunity for polygamous love. Thus, it’s rare that I appreciate polygamous societies because they’re dripping with patriarchy. Polygamy ought to facilitate equal marriage opportunity for all genders, not just the person with the penis.

Perhaps, this is just a reflection of the historically oppressive institution of marriage. If we examine history, many women did not have sexual agency within their relationships, or any rights at all. I would argue that marriage has progressed significantly in contemporary times, yet most “contemporary” polygamous societies (i.e. mormons) aren’t very “contemporary” in women’s empowerment.

Is polyamory any different? Well, I would argue yes. From the numerous polyamorous women that I’ve encountered, many of them happily participate in this lifestyle and meet polyamorous men that accept them for who they are. While some polyamorous women are married, the majority of the women I’ve met are single. And no, polyamorous marriages do not necessarily equal polygamy. In fact, there are laws in this country forbidding legal marriage to more than one person. Why? I’m not sure. I feel like if people want to be married to more than one person OPENLY, they should have that right.

Nevertheless, here are the questions that I want to ask…

Why are women expected to be monogamous? Why does polygamy continue to facilitate prejudice toward women in most societies? Can women in polyamory help transform traditional polygamy should it become legal? Drop your thoughts…

*My partner in polyamory discourse “crime,” Vyzion 360, has joined me in posting on polyamory today. Check out Vyzion’s post, “A Letter to the Monogamous Masses” here and join the conversation.

October 27, 2010

What’s the difference between “sex” and “sexuality”? I would define sex as a form of intercourse, a physical act between two (or multiple) parties. On the other hand, sexuality is the way people express their sexual attractions, sexual orientations, and anything else that exudes how they feel about sex. I’ve mistakenly been called a “sex” writer in the past, when in fact, my writing almost exclusively focuses on sexuality. There is a difference, even though I clearly wouldn’t advocate for discourse over the other. However, it would be rare that you’d find on this blog the “top 5 steps to achieving the strongest orgasm,” instead you’d likely read something on why people may be shy discuss orgasms. See the difference?

All of this to say, I enjoy conversations in both areas and facilitate answers to anonymous questions in my weekly Q&A column. I find that people still remain scared to openly discuss issues surrounding sexuality. If sex is one of the oldest practices of our time and thus, sexuality accompanying it, why is it necessary for us to remain mute?

Is it simply the public space where people remain silent? Do people fear ruining their public image? Losing their jobs? What about online media’s option of anonymity in comments? Why isn’t that take advantage of?

Or is it even in private that we shy away from these discussions? Is it something we keep inside to ourselves? Afraid to admit our fascination? Our desires?

Would more open conversations on sexuality help our youth? each other?

Just some things on my mind…I’d be curious to hear what y’all think…

Drop me a comment

(chart credit: here)

October 17, 2010

Last week, I had the pleasure of being interviewed by Abiola Abrams on her Love, Sex & Dating (LSD) show. I remember being in high school and discovering Abiola’s profile on BlackPlanet.com (I know THROWBACK!!! lol). If her name and face look familiar, Abiola has been a media personality on BET, HBO, NBC…and (dare I say it on this blog) FOX! After watching some of her video segments, my immediate thought was “WOW! This chick has SO MUCH ENERGY!” In real life, I also have to confess that she was no different. She was a wonderful host alongside her producer Kristal. I truly had a blast and discussed topics, such as No Wedding No Womb and my documentary, The Bi-deology Project. Additionally, the show featured interviews with the phenomenal (this is an understatement) Journalist/Radio Host Farai Chideya and Singer/Artist Gilbere Forte. I’d encourage you all to watch the whole 1 hour episode, BUT since I know your time can be precious, if you only want to watch my interview, the time slot is 35:20 to 53:50. For those who tuned in to watch my appearance live, muchismas gracias! I appreciate everyone’s support. You inspire me! Special thanks to Twanna Hines of FunkyBrownChick.com, she’s featured in The Bi-deology Project and submitted my name to Abiola. More and more people find out about my work due to everyone’s support, so truly thank you and enjoy the show!

October 08, 2010

I had a very “interesting” interview last night with an Atlanta based radio show entitled the “Relationship Party,” hosted by Charmaine & Friends. After viewing my documentary series, The Bi-deology Project, which discusses straight women dating bisexual men, Charmaine asked me to be a guest on her show to convey my research, the inspiration behind the project, and thus, my views on sexuality. Of course, I expected this to be a primarily conservative audience in terms of sexuality. Yet, having my expectation (or stereotype) reconfirmed, was quite interesting. I was thankful that people were listening, even though it was clear that they weren’t “hearing” me. As I said on the show, sexuality is very complex: no sexual orientation categories are going to embody every person’s desires and actions. Until we start to recognize that “gay” and “straight” won’t define everyone, even adding “bisexual” still won’t account for every individual, the more misunderstandings, problems, and bad experiences, we will continue to have.

I’m going to let y’all listen to the show. I’m only on for the 1st hour because I had to return home to pack for my trip to Chicago. I know an hour is long for most of us with limited attention spans lol, but I’d encourage you to listen to the full conversation and especially after I got off air….the comments that came in about me once I wasn’t there to speak were….well to put it in a classy way lol…were borderline disrespectful. Nevertheless, it’s nothing that I haven’t experienced as a sexuality writer, filmmaker, and above all thinker. The overwhelmingly positive response that I’ve gotten from the documentary series always inspires me to continue my work.

Just to give y’all a recap of what we discussed and some of the comments

According to the co-host Rod & 1st audience caller, if a man sleeps with a man, he’s gay (and same for a woman sleeping with a woman) and there are only two categories of sexual orientation “gay” or “straight”, anything else is “denial.”

According to Charmaine, the main host, WebMD.com did an article pulling research from the CDC that confirmed that heterosexual women were significantly receiving HIV/AIDS from men engaging in bisexual activity. (I have YET to encounter this claim (and stereotype) in my research. From my research with the CDC, they have yet to announce that this is a leading demographic giving HIV/AIDS to heterosexual women…but if anyone has something else on record from the CDC, please drop it in the comment section)

Charmaine also concluded from her above “research” that straight men may have to worry now that some straight women are willing to sleep with bisexual men. *serious face*

Rod, the co-host, and the 1st audience caller, also believes that men and women engaging in homosexual acts should be defined as “gay” because according to Webster’s dictionary that’s what they are. *straight face*

Additionally, Charmaine said that her self-identified gay male friends said that sex is different between men and women. Thus, she asked me if it was truly plausible for a bisexual man to be satisfied in a relationship, and she concluded that because the sex is different that this is a valid concern for straight women.

There were MANY stereotypes and questions about bisexual people that surfaced during my interview. I believe I answered everything concretely while I was on air, after I left, there’s only but so much I can do without a mic.

Feel free to drop a comment below on what you thought of the show. If you feel so compelled to address Charmaine and Rod yourself, you can contact them here.

Listen to internet radio with Relationship Party on Blog Talk Radio
October 04, 2010

It’s been a lonnnggg time coming! ::cue Sam Cooke::

The Bi-deology Project: Part 2 officially has been released with new interviews and more revelations from straight women dating bisexual men. Just to give a little teaser: think gender roles, definitions of masculinity, debunking stereotypes, and other confessions of the curious imagination.

We need your help to get the word out.

1. Share the video on your blog (do a post on what’s your opinion on the topic), tweet about it on Twitter, send it out as an email to your friends, and/or post it to your Facebook profile. (After the video finishes, the various share options are available for your choosing).

2. If you haven’t joined our Facebook fan page, click here to do so and definitely invite all of your friends!

3. Follow our director on Twitter to get updates on when Part Three will be released and future episode themes

We’re excited to reignite this unique conversation surrounding heterosexual relationships.

Happy Viewing,

The Bi-deology Project Production Team